Regulatory evolution and theoretical arguments in evolutionary biology

Science and Education (forthcoming)
Abstract The cis-regulatory hypothesis is one of the most important claims of evolutionary developmental biology. In this paper I examine the theoretical argument for cis-regulatory evolution and its role within evolutionary theorizing. I show that, although the argument has some weaknesses, it acts as a useful example for the importance of current scientific debates for science education.
Keywords evo-devo  regulatory evolution  relative significance argument
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Ehud Lamm (2009). Conceptual and Methodological Biases in Network Models. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1178:291-304.
    Rachael L. Brown (forthcoming). What Evolvability Really Is. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
    Mika Skippari & Päivi Holmlund (2007). The Evolution of Non-Market Strategies in a Changing Regulatory Environment. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:412-415.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-03-23

    Total downloads

    41 ( #27,923 of 549,125 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    28 ( #1,697 of 549,125 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums