David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 40 (02):433- (1990)
The Stoic theory of knowledge was founded by Zeno on a perceptual and crudely materialistic base, but subsequently developed into an elaborate theory involving λεκτ which has proved difficult to reconstruct. The evolution of the school, influenced not only by internal differences but also by interaction with the Platonic Academy, certainly contributed to this development. Hence any adequate reconstruction of the Stoic theory of knowledge must take account of the differences among the positions of the different representatives of the school with respect to the criticism put foward by the Academics. I propose here to clarify Zeno's position, showing how Arcesilaus' criticism helped to expose certain lacunae and thus to bring about changes in doctrine on the part both of Zeno himself and of his immediate successors
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Riccardo Chiaradonna (2012). Plotinus' Account of the Cognitive Powers of the Soul: Sense Perception and Discursive Thought. [REVIEW] Topoi 31 (2):191-207.
Similar books and articles
Robert J. Rabel (1988). The Stoic Tradition From Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages. I. Stoicism in Classical Latin Literature, And: The Stoic Tradition From Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages. II. Stoicism in Christian Latin Thought, And: Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism, And: Aristotle and the Stoics (Review). [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (1):140-145.
J. R. Mattingly (1939). Early Stoicism and the Problem of its Systematic Form. Philosophical Review 48 (3):273-295.
Rod Bertolet (2006). Modes of Presentation and Modes of Determination in Frege. Journal of Philosophical Research 31:233-238.
Brad Inwood (1989). The Stoic Tradition From Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages: Vol. 1: Stoicism in Classical Latin Literature; Vol. 2: Stoicism in Christian Latin Thought Through the Sixth Century. [REVIEW] Ancient Philosophy 9 (2):337-339.
Zsuzsa Baross (1985). Disease and Social Theory: A Problem of Conversation. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 6 (2).
Constance Meinwald (2005). Ignorance and Opinion in Stoic Epistemology. Phronesis 50 (3):215 - 231.
Constance Meinwald (2005). Ignorance and Opinion in Stoic Epistemology. Phronesis 50 (3):215-231.
Donald Robertson (2010). The Philosophy of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (Cbt): Stoic Philosophy as Rational and Cognitive Psychotherapy. Karnac.
Athanassios Raftopoulos (2013). The Cognitive Impenetrability of the Content of Early Vision is a Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Purely Nonconceptual Content. Philosophical Psychology (5):1-20.
Lillian M. Range & C. Randy Cotton (1995). Assent and Permission Rejoinder. Ethics and Behavior 5 (4):345 – 347.
Steven K. Strange & Jack Zupko (eds.) (2004). Stoicism: Traditions and Transformations. Cambridge University Press.
Alexander Miller (2010). The Reasonableness of Faith and Assent in Newman's Parochial and Plain Sermons and Grammar of Assent. Newman Studies Journal 7 (2):41-54.
Lillian M. Range & C. Randy Cotton (1995). Reports of Assent and Permission in Research with Children: Illustrations and Suggestions. Ethics and Behavior 5 (1):49 – 66.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads7 ( #264,701 of 1,696,588 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,974 of 1,696,588 )
How can I increase my downloads?