David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hypatia 26 (1):22-42 (2011)
This article provides an affirmative feminist reading of the philosophy of Henri Bergson by reading it through the work of Karen Barad. Adopting such a diffractive reading strategy enables feminist philosophy to move beyond discarding Bergson for his apparent phallocentrism. Feminist philosophy finds itself double bound when it critiques a philosophy for being phallocentric, because the setup of a master narrative comes into being with the critique. By negating a gender-blind or sexist philosophy, feminist philosophy only reaffirms its parameters, and setting up a master narrative costs feminist philosophy its feminism. I thus propose and practice a different methodological starting point, one that capitalizes on “diffraction.” This article experiments with the affirmative phase in feminist philosophy prophesied by Elizabeth Grosz, among others. Working along the lines of the diffractive method, the article at the same time proposes a new reading of Bergson (as well as of Barad), a new, different metaphysics indeed, which can be specified as onto-epistemological or “new materialist.”
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Karen Barad (1996). Feminism and the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. In Lynn Hankinson Nelson & Jack Nelson (eds.), Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science. 161--94.
Karen Michelle Barad (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.
Henri Bergson (2007). Creative Evolution. Palgrave Macmillan.
Henri Bergson (1913/2001). Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. Dover Publications.
Citations of this work BETA
Aud Sissel Hoel & Iris Tuin (2013). The Ontological Force of Technicity: Reading Cassirer and Simondon Diffractively. Philosophy and Technology 26 (2):187-202.
Similar books and articles
Rebecca Hill (2008). Phallocentrism in Bergson: Life and Matter. Deleuze Studies 2 (Suppl):123-136.
Rosemary Hennessy (1993). Women's Lives / Feminist Knowledge: Feminist Standpoint as Ideology Critique. Hypatia 8 (1):14 - 34.
Dan Zahavi (2010). Life, Thinking and Phenomenology in the Early Bergson. In Michael R. Kelly (ed.), Bergson and Phenomenology. Palgrave Macmillan. 118--133.
Johanna Oksala (2006). A Phenomenology of Gender. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):229-244.
F. C. T. Moore (1996). Bergson: Thinking Backwards. Cambridge University Press.
Rebecca Hill (2008). Interval, Sexual Difference: Luce Irigaray and Henri Bergson. Hypatia 23 (1):119-131.
Joseph Rouse (2004). Barad's Feminist Naturalism. Hypatia 19 (1):142-161.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads55 ( #40,819 of 1,696,342 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #111,244 of 1,696,342 )
How can I increase my downloads?