Foundations of Science 7 (4):453-463 (2002)
|Abstract||A modern assessment of the classical Boltzmann-Schuetz argument for large-scale entropy fluctuations as the origin of our observable cosmological domain is given.The emphasis is put on the central implication of this picture which flatly contradicts the weak anthropic principle as an epistemological statement about the universe. Therefore, to associate this picture with the anthropic principle as it is usually done is unwarranted. In particular, Feynman's criticism of theanthropic principle based on the entropy-fluctuation picture is a product of this semantic confusion.|
|Keywords||arrow of time anthropic principle entropy philosophy of cosmology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Patrick A. Wilson (1994). Carter on Anthropic Principle Predictions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):241-253.
Quentin Smith (1992). The Anthropic Coincidences, Evil and the Disconfirmation of Theism. Religious Studies 28 (3):347 - 350.
Milan Cirkovic (2003). The Thermodynamical Arrow of Time: Reinterpreting the Boltzmann–Schuetz Argument. [REVIEW] Foundations of Physics 33 (3):467-490.
Errol E. Harris (1992). Cosmos and Theos: Ethical and Theological Implications of the Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Humanities Press.
Errol E. Harris (1991/1998). Cosmos and Anthropos: A Philosophical Interpretation of the Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Humanity Books.
Frank J. Tipler (1988). The Anthropic Principle: A Primer for Philosophers. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:27 - 48.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads57 ( #20,790 of 722,776 )
Recent downloads (6 months)33 ( #3,536 of 722,776 )
How can I increase my downloads?