Foundations of Science 11 (3) (2006)
|Abstract||The experimental setup of the self-referential quantum measurement, jovially known as the ‘quantum suicide’ or the ‘quantum Russian roulette’ is analyzed from the point of view of the Principal Principle of David Lewis. It is shown that the apparent violation of this principle – relating objective probabilities and subjective chance – in this type of thought experiment is just an illusion due to the usage of some terms and concepts ill-defined in the quantum context. We conclude that even in the case that Everett’s (or some other ‘no-collapse’) theory is a correct description of reality, we can coherently believe in equating subjective credence with objective chance in quantum-mechanical experiments. This is in agreement with results of the research on personal identity in the quantum context by Parfit and Tappenden.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Amit Hagar & Meir Hemmo (2006). Explaining the Unobserved: Why Quantum Theory Ain't Only About Information. Foundations of Physics 36 (9):1295-1234.
I. I. I. Durand (1960). On the Theory of Measurement in Quantum Mechanical Systems. Philosophy of Science 27 (2):115-133.
C. Lehner (1997). What It Feels Like to Be in a Superposition, and Why: Consciousness and the Interpretation of Everett's Quantum Mechanics. Synthese 110 (2):191-216.
Itamar Pitowsky (2003). Betting on the Outcomes of Measurements: A Bayesian Theory of Quantum Probability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (3):395-414.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #54,718 of 556,840 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,840 )
How can I increase my downloads?