British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (2):123-137 (2005)
|Abstract||Appropriation art has often been thought to support the view that authorship in art is an outmoded or misguided notion. Through a thought experiment comparing appropriation art to a unique case of artistic forgery, I examine and reject a number of candidates for the distinction that makes artists the authors of their work while forgers are not. The crucial difference is seen to lie in the fact that artists bear ultimate responsibility for whatever objectives they choose to pursue through their work, whereas the forger's central objectives are determined by the nature of the activity of forgery. Appropriation artists, by revealing that no aspect of the objectives an artist pursues are in fact built in to the concept of art, demonstrate artists' responsibility for all aspects of their objectives and, hence, of their products. This responsibility is constitutive of authorship and accounts for the interpretability of artworks. Far from undermining the concept of authorship in art, then, the appropriation artists in fact reaffirm and strengthen it.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jerrold Levinson (ed.) (1998). Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Cambridge University Press.
Darren Hudson Hick (2010). Forgery and Appropriation in Art. Philosophy Compass 5 (12):1047-1056.
Paulo Vélez León, Notes on the Situation of Contemporary Art in Ecuador (Notas Sobre la Situación Del Arte Contemporáneo En Ecuador).
Christy Mag Uidhir (2011). Minimal Authorship (of Sorts). Philosophical Studies 154 (3):373-387.
Guy Rohrbaugh (2005). I Could Have Done That. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):209-228.
George C. Schuetze (2005). Convergences in Music and Art: A Bibliographic Study. Harmonie Park Press.
James O. Young (2006). Art, Authenticity and Appropriation. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):455-476.
Eve A. Isham, Arne D. Ekstrom & WIlliam P. Banks (2010). Effects of Youth Authorship on the Appraisal of Paintings. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 4 (4):235.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads154 ( #2,485 of 556,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #27,255 of 556,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?