Appropriation and authorship in contemporary art
British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (2):123-137 (2005)
| Abstract | Appropriation art has often been thought to support the view that authorship in art is an outmoded or misguided notion. Through a thought experiment comparing appropriation art to a unique case of artistic forgery, I examine and reject a number of candidates for the distinction that makes artists the authors of their work while forgers are not. The crucial difference is seen to lie in the fact that artists bear ultimate responsibility for whatever objectives they choose to pursue through their work, whereas the forger's central objectives are determined by the nature of the activity of forgery. Appropriation artists, by revealing that no aspect of the objectives an artist pursues are in fact built in to the concept of art, demonstrate artists' responsibility for all aspects of their objectives and, hence, of their products. This responsibility is constitutive of authorship and accounts for the interpretability of artworks. Far from undermining the concept of authorship in art, then, the appropriation artists in fact reaffirm and strengthen it. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJerrold Levinson (ed.) (1998). Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Cambridge University Press.
Darren Hudson Hick (2010). Forgery and Appropriation in Art. Philosophy Compass 5 (12):1047-1056.
Christy Mag Uidhir (2011). Minimal Authorship (of Sorts). Philosophical Studies 154 (3):373-387.
Guy Rohrbaugh (2005). I Could Have Done That. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):209-228.
George C. Schuetze (2005). Convergences in Music and Art: A Bibliographic Study. Harmonie Park Press.
James O. Young (2006). Art, Authenticity and Appropriation. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):455-476.
Eve A. Isham, Arne D. Ekstrom & WIlliam P. Banks (2010). Effects of Youth Authorship on the Appraisal of Paintings. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 4 (4):235.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads154 ( #2,485 of 556,803 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #27,255 of 556,803 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
