Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):419-419 (1998)
|Abstract||The tautological implications of “innate talents” are outlined. Analogies are drawn between the present review and the nature–nurture controversies of 40 years ago. Ferguson's (1954; 1956) theoretical positions are proposed as a context in which to consider present and future attempts to resolve this long-standing issue.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Rutter (1998). What Can We Learn From Highly Developed Special Skills? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):422-423.
Paul M. Pietroski & Stephen Crain (2005). Innate Ideas. In James A. McGilvray (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky. Cambridge.
Peter J. Taylor (1994). Shifting Frames: From Divided to Distributed Psychologies of Scientific Agents. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:304 - 310.
Stephen P. Stich (ed.) (1975). Innate Ideas. University of California Press.
Andreas C. Lehmann (1998). Historical Increases in Expert Performance Suggest Large Possibilities for Improvement of Performance Without Implicating Innate Capacities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):419-420.
Michael J. A. Howe, Jane W. Davidson & John A. Sloboda (1998). Innate Talents: Reality or Myth? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):399-407.
Michael J. A. Howe, Jane W. Davidson & John A. Sloboda (1998). Natural Born Talents Undiscovered. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):432-437.
Simon Baron-Cohen (1998). Superiority on the Embedded Figures Test in Autism and in Normal Males: Evidence of an “Innate Talent”? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):408-409.
David C. Rowe (1998). Talent Scouts, Not Practice Scouts: Talents Are Real. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):421-422.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #160,171 of 548,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?