Russell's earliest interpretation of Cantorian set theory, 1896–1900

Philosophia Mathematica (1):1-31 (1987)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,709
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Kevin C. Klement (2009). A Cantorian Argument Against Frege's and Early Russell's Theories of Descriptions. In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting". Routledge.
    James Levine (2001). On Russell's Vulnerability to Russell's Paradox. History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (4):207-231.
    David Bostock (2009). Russell's Early Theory of Denoting. History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (1):49-67.
    Joseph W. Dauben (1988). Cantorian Set Theory and Limitations of Size. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (4):541-550.
    F. A. Muller (2001). Sets, Classes, and Categories. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):539-573.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-08-24

    Total downloads

    8 ( #123,255 of 549,715 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #37,450 of 549,715 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums