Armstrong's Account of Probabilistic Laws

Analysis 51 (4):214 - 217 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/51.4.214

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Armstrong and van Fraassen on Probabilistic Laws of Nature.Duncan Maclean - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):1-13.
Tooley’s account of the necessary connection between law and regularity.Tyler Hildebrand - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (1):33-43.
Is the Humean defeated by induction?Benjamin T. H. Smart - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):319-332.
Laws, chances and properties.D. H. Mellor - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):159-170.
The Argument from Laws of Nature Reassessed.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - In M. Ruse & W. Dembski (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to Dna. Cambridge University Press.
Ceteris paribus laws: Classification and deconstruction. [REVIEW]Gerhard Schurz - 2002 - Erkenntnis 57 (3):351Ð372.
Philosophical publications of David Armstrong.Stephen Mumford - manuscript
EI realismo nómico de universales: Algunos problemas (nomical universal realism: Some problems).Joan Pagès - 2001 - Theoria 16 (3):559-582.
A deductive-nomological model of probabilistic explanation.Peter Railton - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (2):206-226.
Against the Statistical Account of Special Science Laws.Andreas Hüttemann & Alexander Reutlinger - 2013 - In Vassilios Karakostas & Dennis Dieks (eds.), Recent Progress in Philosophy of Science: Perspectives and Foundational Problems. The Third European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings. Springer. pp. 181-192.
Models: The blueprints for laws.Nancy Cartwright - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):303.
What is a Law of Nature?D. M. Armstrong - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Sydney Shoemaker.
A critique of Armstrong’s truthmaking account of possibility.Javier Kalhat - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (2):161-176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
145 (#124,435)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gurol Irzik
Sabanci University

Citations of this work

Armstrong and van Fraassen on Probabilistic Laws of Nature.Duncan Maclean - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):1-13.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references