A humanist synthesis of memory, language, and emotions: Qian Mu's interpretation of Confucian philosophy
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (4):425-437 (2009)
While Qian Mu intentionally avoided systematic philosophical arguments, his references to memory, language, and emotions, as expressed in a book he wrote in 1948, were suggestive of new interpretations of traditional Chinese, and especially Confucian, ideas such as human autonomy, mind, human nature, morality, immortality, and spirituality. The foremost contribution of Qian’s humanist synthesis rests in its articulation of the idea of the person. Across the context of memory, language, and emotions, the tiyong dynamics of mind and human nature recreate, in modern terms, the traditional Chinese concept of the person who is individually unique and simultaneously interrelated. Avoiding the extreme polarities of individualism and collectivism, he stresses rather their coexistence. His synthesis explains to the Chinese people something about who they are, the meaning in life in the framework of their culture, and how their (revitalized) way of life is at its best in the most important area, that of human relations.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Roger Ames, Robert C. Solomon & Joel Marks (eds.) (1995). Emotions in Asian Thought: A Dialogue in Comparative Philosophy. SUNY Press.
Irene Bloom (1985). On the Matter of the Mind: The Metaphysical Basis of the Expanded Self. In Donald J. Munro (ed.), Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values. Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan. 293--327.
Wing-tsit Chan (1963). A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, N.J.,Princeton University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Wen Haiming & William Keli’I. Akina (2012). A Naturalist Version of Confucian Morality for Human Rights. Asian Philosophy 22 (1):1-14.
Ji-wei Ci (1999). The Confucian Relational Concept of the Person and its Modern Predicament. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (4):325-346.
Ernesto García Camarero (1985). Bases de datos y representación del conocimiento. Theoria 1 (1):293-303.
Ernesto García Camarero (1985). Bases de Datos Y Representación Del Conocimiento. Theoria 1 (1):293-303.
Gad C. Isay (2005). Qian Mu and the Modern Transformation of Filial Piety. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32 (3):441–454.
Wang Yunping (2008). Confucian Ethics and Emotions. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (3):352 - 365.
Yunping Wang (2008). Confucian Ethics and Emotions. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (3):352-365.
Lü Yaohuai & Huang Deyuan (2008). The Tradition of the Virtue of Qian and Its Contemporary Fate. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):558 - 576.
Yaohuai Lü (2008). The Tradition of the Virtue of Qian and its Contemporary Fate. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):558-576.
Added to index2009-10-03
Total downloads14 ( #109,791 of 1,096,610 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #102,815 of 1,096,610 )
How can I increase my downloads?