Interpretive relevance, contradiction, and compatibility with the text: A rejoinder to Knight
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56 (1):58-61 (1998)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFernanda Ferreira (1999). Distinguishing Interpretive and Post-Interpretive Processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):98-99.
José M. Méndez (1988). The Compatibility of Relevance and Mingle. Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (3):279 - 297.
Judea Pearl (1992). Rejoinder to Comments on ``Reasoning with Belief Functions: An Analysis of Compatibility. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 6 (3):425--443.
Ross B. Emmett (2009). Realism and Relevance in the Economics of a Free Society: The Knight–Hutchison Debate. Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):341-350.
Aaron Ben-Ze’ev (2008). Hating the One You Love. Philosophia 36 (3):277-283.
Graziella Tonfoni (1998). Relativity Theory of Information and Communication in Natural Language. AI and Society 12 (4):322-327.
D. F. Henze (1962). Contradiction Again: A Rejoinder to Prof. Campbell. Analysis 22 (6):142 - 144.
Thomas Talbott (1999). Universalism and the Greater Good. Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):102-105.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #201,838 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
