Two interpretations of ‘grue’– or how to misunderstand the new Riddle of induction

Analysis 64 (284):335–339 (2004)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,085
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Simon Blackburn (1969). Goodman's Paradox. In Peter Achinstein (ed.), Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Oxford, Published by Basil Blackwell with the Cooperation of the University of Pittsburg. 128--42.
Yaël Cohen (1979). A New View of Grue. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 10 (2):244-252.
Nelson Goodman (1946). A Query on Confirmation. Journal of Philosophy 43 (14):383-385.

View all 8 references

Citations of this work BETA
Kenneth Boyce (2014). On the Equivalence of Goodman's and Hempel's Paradoxes. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 45:32-42.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

134 ( #6,377 of 1,101,623 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #19,924 of 1,101,623 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.