Some Comments on the Historical Role of Fetishim in Economic Anthropology

Journal of Global Economics, Management and Business Research 7 (1):61-82 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Following an interdisciplinary approach going through the grounds of psychological anthropology, symbolic anthropology, sociology and ethnography, pursued with an historical methodology, in this paper we wish to argue about the role played by fetishism in economic anthropology and its possible applications. Anyway, what emerges is the primary importance of the occurrence of fetishism in the rising of human symbolic function, explained through a psychoanalytical model based on disavowal mechanism, with a view towards applications in marketing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Σύμβολου: An attempt toward the early origins: Part 2.Giuseppe Iurato - 2013 - Language and Psychoanalysis (ISSN 2049-324X) 2 (2):121-160.
Cinema and Fetishism: The Disavowal of a Concept.Sean Homer - 2005 - Historical Materialism 13 (1):85-116.
Anthropology: a continental perspective.Christoph Wulf - 2013 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cultures of fetishism.Louise J. Kaplan - 2006 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Reconnecting Marketing to Markets.Luis Araujo, John Finch & Hans Kjellberg (eds.) - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Object Lessons: Fetishism, Subjective Knowledge, and Objective Desire.Ellen Lee Mccallum - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-26

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references