Graduate studies at Western
Erkenntnis 78 (5):1109-1132 (2013)
|Abstract||There has been a significant interest in the recent literature in developing a solution to the problem of theory choice which is both normative and descriptive, but agent-based rather than rule-based, originating from Pierre Duhem’s notion of ‘good sense’. In this paper we present the properties Duhem attributes to good sense in different contexts, before examining its current reconstructions advanced in the literature and their limitations. We propose an alternative account of good sense, seen as promoting social consensus in science, and show that it is superior to its rivals in two respects: it is more faithful to Duhemian good sense, and it cashes out the effect that virtues have on scientific progress. We then defend the social consensus account against objections that highlight the positive role of diversity and division of labour in science|
|Keywords||Theory choice Pierre Duhem Social choice Good sense Underdetermination|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Milena Ivanova (2010). Pierre Duhem's Good Sense as a Guide to Theory Choice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):58-64.
David J. Stump (2007). Pierre Duhem's Virtue Epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18 (1):149-159.
Colin Bird (2000). The Possibility of Self-Government. American Political Science Review 94 (3):563-577.
Richard Holton (2006). The Act of Choice. Philosophers' Imprint 6 (3):1-15.
Paul Weirich (1984). Interpersonal Utility in Principles of Social Choice. Erkenntnis 21 (3):295 - 317.
K. M. Darling (2002). The Complete Duhemian Underdetermination Argument: Scientific Language and Practice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (3):511-533.
S. Okasha (2011). Theory Choice and Social Choice: Kuhn Versus Arrow. Mind 120 (477):83-115.
Shaun Gallagher (2010). Multiple Aspects of Agency. New Ideas in Psychology.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2008). Reducible and Nonsensical Uses of Game Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (2):247-266.
Göran Duus-Otterström (2011). Freedom of Will and the Value of Choice. Social Theory and Practice 37 (2):256-284.
Martin Carrier (2011). Underdetermination as an Epistemological Test Tube: Expounding Hidden Values of the Scientific Community. Synthese 180 (2):189 - 204.
Matti Sintonen (1986). Selectivity and Theory Choice. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:364 - 373.
D. N. Osherson, M. Stob & S. Weinstein (1987). Social Learning and Collective Choice. Synthese 70 (3):319 - 347.
Richard Arneson, Distributive Justice and Basic Capability Equality: 'Good Enough' is Not Good Enough Richard J. Arneson.
Giacomo Bonanno (1988). Can Good News Lead to a More Pessimistic Choice of Action? Theory and Decision 25 (2):123-136.
Added to index2012-09-02
Total downloads47 ( #27,388 of 739,347 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #6,093 of 739,347 )
How can I increase my downloads?