Pluralism and the Hobbesian logic of negative constitutionalism
| Abstract | According to an essentially Hobbesian account of political order, the claims of cultural and national minorities within a state to some form of constitutional or institutional recognition are morally suspect and politically undesirable. Underlying this Hobbesian logic is a particular understanding of the relation between law and politics. `Negative constitutionalism' is focused primarily on limiting the damage government can do. However the pursuit of constitutional minimalism runs up against the challenges presented by deeply diverse political communities. By investigating the manner in which Hobbes has been invoked in arguments concerning the relation between the rule of law and the `politics of recognition', I argue (i) that the distinction between the rule of law and politics is fundamentally unstable, and (ii) that in invoking Hobbes, modern theorists have missed an important element of Hobbes's own argument ± namely, his appreciation of this instability. As an example, I examine the way Hobbes is used in some of John Gray's recent writings on pluralism and liberalism. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Sergei Prozorov (2009). The Appropriation of Abandonment: Giorgio Agamben on the State of Nature and the Political. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (3):327-353.
Andres di Leo Razuk (2011). God as the Equilibrium of the Hobbesian Political Philosophical System. Hobbes Studies 24 (1):24-43.
Norberto Bobbio (1993). Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Wendy Gunther-Canada (2006). Catharine Macaulay on the Paradox of Paternal Authority in Hobbesian Politics. Hypatia 21 (2):150-173.
Jody S. Kraus (1993). The Limits of Hobbesian Contractarianism. Cambridge University Press.
Gabriella Slomp (2007). Kant Against Hobbes: Reasoning and Rhetoric. Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):207-222.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads12 ( #93,408 of 549,119 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,119 )How can I increase my downloads? |

