Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (29):147-155 (2010)
|Abstract||For some contemporary liberal philosophers, a huge concern is liberal neutrality, which is the idea that the state should be neutral among competing conceptions of the moral good pursued by the people. In The Morality of Freedom, Joseph Raz argues that we can neither achieve nor even approximate such neutrality. He shows that neutrality and fairness are different ideas. His notion of neutrality is stricter than John Rawls's and Ronald Dworkin's. Raz shows that both helping and not helping can be neutral or non-neutral, thus neutrality is chimerical. Wojciech Sadurski's appeal to rational expectations does not necessarily tell us which action is neutral. Distinguishing between comprehensive and narrow neutrality, Raz also claims that only the former is a proper response to conflicts. Sadurski criticizes it, claiming that conflicts are comprehensive in a sense which does not deny the adequacy of the narrow neutrality. In reality, however, it is almost impossible to achieve even the narrow neutrality. A theory is presented to explain why political neutrality is almost impossible to achieve. Philosophically, there is no neutral ground for neutral politics.|
|Keywords||Joseph Raz Wojciech Sadurski liberalism liberal neutrality neutral politics political philosophy political theory|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
George J. Agich (1983). Disease and Value: A Rejection of the Value-Neutrality Thesis. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 4 (1).
Per Sundström (1998). Interpreting the Notion That Technology is Value-Neutral. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 1 (1):41-45.
Elizabeth Brake (2004). Rawls and Feminism: What Should Feminists Make of Liberal Neutrality? Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (3):293-309.
Loren E. Lomasky (1990). But is It Liberalism? Critical Review 4 (1-2):86-105.
Zhidas Daskalovski (2002). Neutrality, Liberal Nation Building and Minority Cultural Rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (3):27-50.
Robert Westmoreland (2011). Realizing Â€˜Politicalâ€™ Neutrality. Law and Philosophy 30 (5):541-573.
Matt Sensat Waldren (2013). Why Liberal Neutralists Should Accept Educational Neutrality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):71-83.
Added to index2009-02-08
Total downloads176 ( #1,760 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #8,781 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?