Business, consumers and sustainable living in an interconnected world: A multilateral ecocentric approach [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 20 (4):273 - 288 (1999)
Current conceptualizations of environmental responsibility follow a human-centered approach wherein the natural environment is seen as instrumental to human ends. Environmental responsibility, in this context, emerges primarily as the preservation and sustenance of nature in a manner that would limit waste, enhance the aesthetic and spiritual value of nature, and confer psychological and economic rewards upon individuals and businesses that follow a sustainable course of interaction with nature. In contrast, this paper advances an ecocentric approach to sustainable living that ensures the dialectic between human systems and natural and technical systems by explicitly recognizing nature as central to survival and progress. Environmental responsibility within this approach is viewed to be multilateral and institutional rather than merely as moral responsibility of business or of governments.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joe DesJardins (1998). Corporate Environmental Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (8):825 - 838.
Philip W. Sutton (2004). Nature, Environment, and Society. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sheldene K. Simola (2007). The Pragmatics of Care in Sustainable Global Enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (2):131 - 147.
Azlan Amran (2011). The Stakeholder Approach: A Sustainability Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 98 (1):121 - 136.
Laura Westra (2009). Why Norton's Approach is Insufficient for Environmental Ethics. In Ben A. Minteer (ed.), Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy. Temple University Press. 279-297.
L. Metcalf & S. Benn (2012). The Corporation is Ailing Social Technology: Creating a 'Fit for Purpose' Design for Sustainability. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 111 (2):195-210.
Carolyn Merchant (1990). Environmental Ethics and Political Conflict: A View From California. Environmental Ethics 12 (1):45-68.
Asterios G. Kefalas (2001). The Environmentally Sustainable Organization (ESO): A Systems Approach. Ethics and the Environment 6 (2):90-105.
Andrew T. Brei (2013). Rights & Nature. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (2):393-408.
Vasileios E. Pantazis (2009). Reverence ( Ehrfurcht ) for the Living World as the Basic Bioethical Principle: Anthropological–Pedagogical Approach. Ethics, Place and Environment 12 (2):255 – 266.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #136,825 of 1,018,166 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #65,321 of 1,018,166 )
How can I increase my downloads?