David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 67 (4):393 - 406 (2006)
There are two opposing views on the nature of corporations in contemporary debates on corporate social responsibility. Opponents of corporate personhood hold that a corporation is nothing but a group of individuals coming together to achieve certain goals. On the other hand, the advocates of corporate personhood believe that corporations are persons in their own right existing over and above the individuals who comprise them. They talk of corporate decision-making structures that help translate individual decisions and actions into corporate decisions and actions. Importantly both the advocates and the opponents of corporate personhood rely on a contractual model of corporate–social interaction to explain corporate social responsibilty. However, this contractual model misses crucial aspects of the relationship between corporations and societies. Economic history reveals that the relationship between corporations and societies is essentially dynamic and heterogeneous and so extremely difficult to characterise in terms of a contract. The economic and the political aspects of this relationship are so finely intertwined with each other and it is impossible to extricate the one from the other. We need to be more conscious of the actual nature of corporate–social interaction in order to deal more comprehensively with issues of corporate social responsibility.
|Keywords||corporate personhood corporate social responsibility contract theory economic history society|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
S. Douglas Beets (2011). Critical Events in the Ethics of U.S. Corporation History. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (2):193-219.
Arun A. Iyer (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility and Farmer Suicides: A Case for Benign Paternalism? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4):429 - 443.
Ralph W. Jackson, Charles M. Wood & James J. Zboja (2013). The Dissolution of Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: A Comprehensive Review and Model. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 116 (2):233-250.
Similar books and articles
Richard H. Guerrette (1986). Environmental Integrity and Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (5):409 - 415.
Jacob Dahl Rendtorff (2009). Responsibility, Ethics, and Legitimacy of Corporations. International Specialized Book Services [Distributor].
Jeffrey Nesteruk (2007). Corporate Speech as Commercial Speech. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (1):97-103.
Eun-Kyoung Han, Dong-Han Lee & Hyoungkoo Khang (2008). Influential Factors of the Social Responsibility of Newspaper Corporations in South Korea. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (3):667 - 680.
Dwight R. Lee & Richard B. McKenzie (1994). Corporate Failure as a Means to Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (12):969 - 978.
Wim Dubbink & Jeffery Smith (2011). A Political Account of Corporate Moral Responsibility. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):223-246.
P. Eddy Wilson (1994). Corporations, Minors, and Other Innocents — a Reply to R. E. Ewin. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (10):761 - 774.
Larry May (1986). Corporate Property Rights. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):225 - 232.
Jeffery Smith (2011). A Political Account of Corporate Moral Responsibility. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):223 - 246.
Jacquie L'Etang (1994). Public Relations and Corporate Social Responsibility: Some Issues Arising. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (2):111 - 123.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #107,183 of 1,100,097 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #51,421 of 1,100,097 )
How can I increase my downloads?