David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy 41 (156):113 - 126 (1966)
It will, I suppose, be readily agreed that questions concerning the scope of moral principles are of vital importance for the moral philosopher. If we are to accept a view, such as Professor Hare's, that there are formal criteria for any morality if it is to count as a morality, then it is necessary to know what is left outside the fence. Are Egoism and Caste Morality to count as moralities, restricted to the interests of one and of a limited group of persons respectively; or is there a logical absurdity in calling them moralities at all? Hare's thesis of ‘prescriptive universalisability’, as definitive of the formal structure of any moral system, rules out such restricted ‘moralities’. Using ‘ought’ as a key-concept in moral discourse, Hare suggests that the word has two basic functions: to prescribe: meaning to commend courses of action sincerely to oneself and others. to prescribe consistently, or universalisably; that is, in the same way, on relevantly similar occasions, to anyone, including oneself, unless valid reasons for discrimination of persons can be offered
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert Shaver (1994). Inescapable and Affective Moralities. Philosophical Studies 75 (3):175 - 199.
E. Algaba, J. M. Bilbao & J. J. López (2001). A Unified Approach to Restricted Games. Theory and Decision 50 (4):333-345.
Nathan Nobis (2006). Putting Humans First? [REVIEW] Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (1):85 - 104.
James Wilson (2007). Nietzsche and Equality. In Gudrun von Tevenar (ed.), Nietzsche and Ethics. Peter Lang
David B. Wong (2006). Natural Moralities: A Defense of Pluralistic Relativism. Oxford University Press.
Jing-Bao Nie (2000). The Plurality of Chinese and American Medical Moralities: Toward an Interpretive Cross-Cultural Bioethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (3):239-260.
James Stacey Taylor (2006). Why Markets in Proto-Deceptive Goods Should Be Restricted. Journal of Business Ethics 65 (4):325 - 335.
Thomas W. Pogge (1992). Loopholes in Moralities. Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):79-98.
Ted Honderich (1996). Consequentialism, Moralities of Concern, and Selfishness. Philosophy 71 (278):499 - 520.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-10
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?