David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1):145-163 (2002)
Maimonides uses Aristotelian philosophical idiom to articulate his moral philosophy, but there are fundamental differences between his and Aristotle’s conceptions of moral psychology and the nature of the moral agent. The Maimonidean conception of volition and its role in repentance and ethical self-correction are quite un-Aristotelian. The relation between this capacity to alter one’s character and the accessibility of ethical requirements given in the Law is explored. This relation helps explain why for Maimonides practical wisdom is not recognized as a virtue, and why ethical perfection (a requirement for human perfection) is achievable even by those long-established in ethically unsound dispositions. The power of will to “restore the soul” (by following the prescriptions of the Law) when character is disordered is a significant departure from Aristotelian philosophical anthropology
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Jacobs (1997). Plasticity and Perfection: Maimonides and Aristotle on Character. Religious Studies 33 (4):443-454.
Jonathan Jacobs (2013). “Forgiveness and Perfection,”. In David Konstan Charles Grisowld (ed.), Ancient Forgiveness. Cambridge University Press
Joshua Parens (2003). Maimonidean Ethics Revisited: Development and Asceticism in Maimonides? Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 12 (3):33-62.
Daniel H. Frank (2002). The Development of Maimonides' Moral Psychology. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1):89-105.
Michael P. Levine (1986). The Role of Reason in the Ethics of Maimonides: Or, Why Maimonides Could Have Had a Doctrine of Natural Law Even If He Did Not. Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (2):279 - 295.
Owen Goldin (1992). Metaphysical Explanation and “Partcularization” in Maimonides' Guide of the Perplexed. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:189-213.
Moses Maimonides & Salo Wittmayer Baron (eds.) (1941). Essays on Maimonides. New York, Ams Press.
Jonathan Jacobs (2010). Law, Reason, and Morality in Medieval Jewish Philosophy: Saadia Gaon, Bahya Ibn Pakuda, and Moses Maimonides. OUP Oxford.
Moses Maimonides (1975). Ethical Writings of Maimonides. Dover Publications.
Leo Strauss (2013). Leo Strauss on Maimonides: The Complete Writings. The University of Chicago Press.
Raymond L. Weiss (1991). Maimonides' Ethics: The Encounter of Philosophic and Religious Morality. University of Chicago Press.
Diana Lobel (2011). Being and the Good: Maimonides on Ontological Beauty. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 19 (1):1-45.
Don Seeman (2008). Honoring the Divine as Virtue and Practice in Maimonides. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 16 (2):195-251.
Menachem Marc Kellner (2010). Torah in the Observatory: Gersonides, Maimonides, Song of Songs. Academic Studies Press.
Added to index2011-02-22
Total downloads12 ( #301,137 of 1,911,856 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,984 of 1,911,856 )
How can I increase my downloads?