Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw: Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability – Towards a foundation of bioethics and biolaw

This article summarizes some of the results of the BIOMED II project “Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw” connected to a research project of the Danish Research Councils “Bioethics and Law”. The BIOMED project was based on cooperation between 22 partners in most EU countries. The aim of the project was to identify the ethical principles of respect for autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability as four important ideas or values for a European bioethics and biolaw. The research concluded that the basic ethical principles cannot be understood as universal everlasting ideas or transcendental truths but they rather function reflective guidelines and important values in European culture. The method of the research was conceptual, philosophical analysis of the cultural background of the four values or normative ideas that people use and find important in their existence. Moreover, this was combined with analysis of empirical legal material and policy documents. Also, a number of qualitative interviews with relevant experts were carried out. Another important result of the BIOMED project was the partner's Policy Proposals to the European Commission, the Barcelona Declaration, unique as a philosophical and political agreement between experts in bioethics and biolaw from many different countries. The Policy Proposals are reprinted here at the end of the article
Keywords autonomy  bioethics  biolaw  dignity  Europe  integrity  vulnerability
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1021132602330
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,211
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Wendy Rogers, Catriona Mackenzie & Susan Dodds (2012). Why Bioethics Needs a Concept of Vulnerability. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):11-38.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Susan Cartier Poland (2005). Bioethics, Biolaw, and Western Legal Heritage. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (2):211-218.
Baruch A. Brody (1990). Quality of Scholarship in Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):161-178.
Matthew Carey Jordan (2010). Bioethics and "Human Dignity". Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):180-196.
Florencia Luna (2009). Elucidating the Concept of Vulnerability: Layers Not Labels. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1):121 - 139.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

66 ( #68,336 of 1,935,139 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #77,049 of 1,935,139 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.