Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw: Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability – Towards a foundation of bioethics and biolaw
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (3):235-244 (2002)
This article summarizes some of the results of the BIOMED II project “Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw” connected to a research project of the Danish Research Councils “Bioethics and Law”. The BIOMED project was based on cooperation between 22 partners in most EU countries. The aim of the project was to identify the ethical principles of respect for autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability as four important ideas or values for a European bioethics and biolaw. The research concluded that the basic ethical principles cannot be understood as universal everlasting ideas or transcendental truths but they rather function reflective guidelines and important values in European culture. The method of the research was conceptual, philosophical analysis of the cultural background of the four values or normative ideas that people use and find important in their existence. Moreover, this was combined with analysis of empirical legal material and policy documents. Also, a number of qualitative interviews with relevant experts were carried out. Another important result of the BIOMED project was the partner's Policy Proposals to the European Commission, the Barcelona Declaration, unique as a philosophical and political agreement between experts in bioethics and biolaw from many different countries. The Policy Proposals are reprinted here at the end of the article
|Keywords||autonomy bioethics biolaw dignity Europe integrity vulnerability|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Samia A. Hurst (2008). Vulnerability in Research and Health Care; Describing the Elephant in the Room? Bioethics 22 (4):191–202.
Jennifer Kuzma & John C. Besley (2008). Ethics of Risk Analysis and Regulatory Review: From Bio- to Nanotechnology. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 2 (2):149-162.
Wendy Rogers, Catriona Mackenzie & Susan Dodds (2012). Why Bioethics Needs a Concept of Vulnerability. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):11-38.
Jimoh Amzat (2015). The Question of Autonomy in Maternal Health in Africa: A Rights-Based Consideration. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (2):283-293.
Henk ten Have (2015). Respect for Human Vulnerability: The Emergence of a New Principle in Bioethics. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (3):395-408.
Similar books and articles
Jacob Dahl Rendtorff (1998). The Second International Conference About Bioethics and Biolaw: European Principles in Bioethics and Biolaw. [REVIEW] Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 1 (3):271-274.
Matti Häyry (2003). European Values in Bioethics: Why, What, and How to Be Used. [REVIEW] Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (3):199-214.
Evan Simpson (2004). Harms to Dignity, Bioethics, and the Scope of Biolaw. Journal of Palliative Care 20:185-192.
Deryck Beyleveld (2001). Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw. Oxford University Press.
Mary C. Rawlinson (2012). Women and Special Vulnerability: Commentary "On the Principle of Respect for Human Vulnerability and Personal Integrity," UNESCO, International Bioethics Committee Report. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):174-179.
Susan Cartier Poland (2005). Bioethics, Biolaw, and Western Legal Heritage. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (2):211-218.
Alasdair Cochrane (2010). Undignified Bioethics. Bioethics 24 (5):234-241.
Thomas Alured Faunce & Hitoshi Nasu (2009). Normative Foundations of Technology Transfer and Transnational Benefit Principles in the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (3):296-321.
Jonathan Ives & Heather Draper (2009). Appropriate Methodologies for Empirical Bioethics: It's All Relative. Bioethics 23 (4):249-258.
H. Ten Have & Bert Gordijn (eds.) (2001). Bioethics in a European Perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Baruch A. Brody (1990). Quality of Scholarship in Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):161-178.
Matthew Carey Jordan (2010). Bioethics and "Human Dignity". Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):180-196.
Fangerau Heiner, Simon Alfred & Wiesemann Claudia (2003). Improving Information Systems in Europe: EURETHNET. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (1):67-69.
Sahin Aksoy & Ali Tenik (2002). The 'Four Principles of Bioethics' as Found in 13 Th Century Muslim Scholar Mawlana's Teachings. BMC Medical Ethics 3 (1):1-7.
Florencia Luna (2009). Elucidating the Concept of Vulnerability: Layers Not Labels. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1):121 - 139.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads66 ( #68,336 of 1,935,139 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #77,049 of 1,935,139 )
How can I increase my downloads?