Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 (2):142-164 (2000)
|Abstract||Locke’s porphyry argument at 2.8.19 of the Essay has not been properly appreciated. On my reconstruction, Locke argues from the premise that porphyry undergoes a mere Cambridge change of color in different lighting conditions to the conclusion that porphyry’s colors do not belong to it as it is in itself. I argue that his argument is not quite sound, but it would be if Locke chose a different stone, alexandrite. Examining his argument teaches us something about the relation between explanatory qualities and real alterations and something about the ways that colors inhere in bodies|
|Keywords||Body Color Epistemology Light Locke|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter W. Ross (2012). Perceived Colors and Perceived Locations: A Problem for Color Subjectivism. American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):125-138.
Joseph Levine (2006). Color and Color Experience: Colors as Ways of Appearing. Dialectica 60 (3):269-282.
Jonathan Cohen (2003). On the Structural Properties of the Colours. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (1):78-95.
Laura Berchielli (2002). Color, Space, and Figure in Locke: An Interpretation of the Molyneux Problem. Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (1):47-65.
Vivian Mizrahi (2006). Color Objectivism and Color Pluralism. Dialectica 60 (3):283-306.
Mohan Matthen (2010). Color Experience: A Semantic Theory. In Jonathan Cohen & Mohan Matthen (eds.), Color Ontology and Color Science. MIT Press.
Vivian Mizrahi (2010). Color and Transparency. Rivista di Estetica 43 (1).
Matthew Stuart (2003). Locke's Colors. Philosophical Review 112 (1):57-96.
Stephen Palmer (1999). Color, Consciousness, and the Isomorphism Constraint. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):923-943.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #46,354 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,045 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?