David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Argumentation 12 (2):183-198 (1998)
In normative pragmatics, a kind of empirical discourse analysis organized by normative theory, the analysis of any communication process begins with an idealized model of the discourse that can be compared with actual practices. Idealizations of argumentation can be found, among other places, in theoretical descriptions of âcritical discussionâ and other dialogue types. Comparing ideal models with actual practices can pinpoint defects in the models (leading to theoretical refinements), but it can also identify deficiencies in practice. This latter possibility invites redesign around well-justified idealizations. This paper outlines an approach to the design of discourse processes and illustrates the approach with contrastive analysis of several recently developed protocols for discussion and debate on the worldwide web
|Keywords||discourse analysis discourse processes ideal models internet normative pragmatics protocols worldwide web|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Marcin Lewiński & Mark Aakhus (2014). Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry. Argumentation 28 (2):161-185.
Jean Goodwin (2011). Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts. Argumentation 25 (3):285-296.
Sally Jackson (2015). Design Thinking in Argumentation Theory and Practice. Argumentation 29 (3):243-263.
Chris Reed (1997). Representing and Applying Knowledge for Argumentation in a Social Context. AI and Society 11 (1-2):138-154.
Similar books and articles
R. Codinhoto, L. J. Koskela, P. Tzortzopoulos & M. Kagioglou, How Analysis and Synthesis Have Been Understood in Design.
David Wiens (2012). Prescribing Institutions Without Ideal Theory. Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (1):45-70.
Philippe D’Anjou (2010). Toward an Horizon in Design Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):355-370.
Greg Bamford (2002). From Analysis/Synthesis to Conjecture/Analysis: A Review of Karl Popper’s Influence on Design Methodology in Architecture. [REVIEW] Design Studies 23 (3):245-61.
L. J. Koskela & M. Kagioglou, The Proto-Theory of Design: The Method of Analysis of the Ancient Geometers.
Erica Burman (1991). What Discourse is Not. Philosophical Psychology 4 (3):325-342.
A. A. Frediani & C. Boano, Processes for Just Products: The Capability Space of Participatory Design.
Harold Salzman (1991). Engineering Perspectives and Technology Design in the United States. AI and Society 5 (4):339-356.
Paul Hilton Micklethwaite, What is Design? : An Empirical Investigation Into Conceptions of Design in the Community of Design Stakeholders.
Roswitha Hofmann & Doris Allhutter (2010). Situated (Un-)Learning in Software Design: A Deconstructive Approach. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):87-98.
Greg Bamford (1991). Design, Science and Conceptual Analysis. In Jim Plume (ed.), Architectural Science and Design in Harmony: Proceedings of the joint ANZAScA / ADTRA conference, Sydney, 10-12 July, 1990. School of Architecture, University of NSW
Jeffry L. Ramsey (1993). When Reduction Leads to Construction: Design Considerations in Scientific Methodology. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (3):241 – 253.
Frans van Eemeren (2011). In Context. Argumentation 25 (2):141-161.
Jürgen Friedrich (1996). Design Science 97. AI and Society 10 (2):199-217.
Added to index2010-09-11
Total downloads11 ( #322,505 of 1,911,604 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #115,074 of 1,911,604 )
How can I increase my downloads?