Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):273-320 (1996)
|Abstract||The author argues that Descartes is not trapped inside the Cartesian circle. The essay rehearses Descartes’ argument against the “evil demon” hypothesis. The so-called Cartesian circle is described and some of the most prominent discussions of the problem are evaluated. Such arguments tend either to leave Descartes in the circle, or themselves depend upon distinctions that in the end lead to Descartes claiming something less than metaphysical certainty for his system. The author argues that Descartes’ real Archimedian point is the light of nature, and that his project is to extend the certainty of the light of nature to those ideas which are clear and distinct. Using this interpretation of Descartes, the author returns to the accounts of the critics to account for their mischaracterization of Descartes’ reasoning as circular|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Della Rocca (2005). Descartes, the Cartesian Circle, and Epistemology Without God. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):1–33.
Michael Della Rocca (2005). Descartes, the Cartesian Circle, and Epistemology Without God. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):1-33.
Ruth Weintraub (1997). The Cartesian Circle and Two Forms of Scepticism. History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (4):365 - 377.
Husain Sarkar (2003). Descartes' Cogito: Saved From the Great Shipwreck. Cambridge University Press.
Ewing Y. Chinn (1983). A Journey Around the Cartesian Circle. Philosophy Research Archives 9:279-292.
R. J. Butler (1972). Cartesian Studies. Oxford,B. Blackwell.
Georges Dicker (1993). Descartes: An Analytical and Historical Introduction. Oxford University Press.
T. J. Mawson (2001). Eternal Truths and Cartesian Circularity. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (2):197 – 220.
Robert C. Scharff (2006). On Failing to Be Cartesian: Reconsidering the 'Impurity' of Descartes's Meditation. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (4):475 – 504.
Stephen Gaukroger (1989). Cartesian Logic: An Essay on Descartes's Conception of Inference. Clarendon Press.
Samuel C. Rickless (2005). The Cartesian Fallacy Fallacy. Noûs 39 (2):309–336.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads23 ( #60,206 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,222 of 739,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?