Naturalism and the Fate of the M-Worlds

Abstract
We make a huge variety of claims framed in vocabularies drawn from physics and chemistry, everyday talk, neuroscience, ethics, mathematics, semantics, folk and professional psychology, and so on and so forth. We say, for example, that Jones feels cold, that Carlton might win, that there are quarks, that murder is wrong, that there are four fundamental forces, and that a certain level of neurological activity is necessary for thought. If we follow Huw Price's Carnapian lead, we can put this by saying that we make many claims in many different frameworks
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Huw Price (1997). Naturalism and the Fate of the M-Worlds: Huw Price. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 71 (1):247–268.
    Frank Jackson (1997). Naturalism and the Fate of the M-Worlds: Frank Jackson. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 71 (1):269–282.
    Huw Price (1997). Naturalism and the Fate of the M-Worlds. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 71 (1):247 - 282.
    Ning Chen (1997). The Concept of Fate in Mencius. Philosophy East and West 47 (4):495-520.
    Alexander Paseau (2005). Naturalism in Mathematics and the Authority of Philosophy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2):377-396.
    John Dewey (1927). Half-Hearted Naturalism. Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):57-64.
    Huw Price (2004). Naturalism Without Representationalism. In Mario De Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Naturalism in Question. Harvard University Press. 71--88.
    Jaegwon Kim (2002). Horgan's Naturalistic Metaphysics of Mind. Grazer Philosophische Studien 63 (1):27-52.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-04-02

    Total downloads

    96 ( #9,698 of 1,089,153 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,735 of 1,089,153 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.