Philosophers' Imprint 3 (2):1-18 (2003)
|Abstract||Mill's famous proportionality statement of the Greatest Happiness Principle (GHP) is commonly taken to specify his own moral theory. And the discussion in which GHP is embedded -- Chapter 2 of Utilitarianism -- predominates the interpretation of Mill's normative philosophy. Largely because of these suppositions, Mill is traditionally read as a particular kind of utilitarian: a maximizing act-consequentialist. This paper argues that the canonical status accorded to Utilitarianism is belied by the text itself, as well as by its historical context, and that this point largely undermines the orthodox interpretation of Mill. In fact, GHP was intended as the statement of a common creed, acceptable to the diverse class of philosophers Mill counted as utilitarian. Moreover, the discussion of substantive moral theory in Utilitarianism in several respects does not reflect his own view, and the work itself is much less important than it is almost universally taken to be -- though not, it turns out, by Mill himself.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Shia Moser (1963). A Comment on Mill's Argument for Utilitarianism. Inquiry 6 (1-4):308-318.
Deni Elliott (2007). Getting Mill Right. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (2 & 3):100 – 112.
S. Evan Kreider (2011). Mill on Happiness. Philosophical Papers 39 (1):53-68.
David Lyons (1994). Rights, Welfare, and Mill's Moral Theory. Oxford University Press.
Henry R. West (2004). An Introduction to Mill's Utilitarian Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Daniel Jacobson (2008). Utilitarianism Without Consequentialism: The Case of John Stuart Mill. Philosophical Review 117 (2):159-191.
John Stuart Mill (2009). Utilitarianism. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads73 ( #11,407 of 549,118 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,263 of 549,118 )
How can I increase my downloads?