Modeling a theory without a model theory, or, computational modeling “after feyerabend”
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):46-47 (1999)
| Abstract | Levelt et al. attempt to “model their theory” with WEAVER++. Modeling theories requires a model theory. The time is ripe for a methodology for building, testing, and evaluating computational models. We propose a tentative, five-step framework for tackling this problem, within which we discuss the potential strengths and weaknesses of Levelt et al.'s modeling approach. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert L. Ashenhurst (1996). Ontological Aspects of Information Modeling. Minds and Machines 6 (3):287-394.
Harrison C. White (2000). Parameterize!: Notes on Mathematical Modeling for Sociology. Sociological Theory 18 (3):505-509.
Dorrit Billman & Justin Peterson (1989). Critique of Structural Analysis in Modeling Cognition: A Case Study of Jackendoff's Theory. Philosophical Psychology 2 (3):283 – 296.
Boris Kovalerchuk, Leonid Perlovsky & Gregory Wheeler (2012). Modeling of Phenomena and Dynamic Logic of Phenomena. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logic 22 (1):1-82.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #201,781 of 549,010 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
