Graduate studies at Western
American Philosophical Quarterly 36 (4):361-69 (1999)
|Abstract||This paper argues that popular criticisms of semantic holism (such as that it leaves the ideas of translation, disagreement and change of mind problematic) are more properly directed at an "instability assumption" which, while often associated with holism, can be separated from it. The versions of holism that follow from 'interpretational' account of meaning are not committed to the instability assumption and can thus avoid many of the problems traditionally associated with holism.|
|Keywords||Epistemology Holism Language Mental Semantics Truth|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Berg (ed.) (1993). Holism: A Consumer Update. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
H. G. Callaway (1992). Meaning Holism and Semantic Realism (Reprinted in Callaway 2008, Meaning Without Analyticity). Dialectica 46 (1):41-59.
K. Becker (1998). On the Perfectly General Nature of Instability in Meaning Holism. Journal of Philosophy 95 (12):635-640.
Ned Block (1995). Ruritania Revisited. Philosophical Issues 6:171-187.
Cesare Cozzo (2002). Does Epistemological Holism Lead to Meaning Holism? Topoi 21 (1-2):25-45.
John Perry (1994). Fodor and Lepore on Holism. Philosophical Studies 73 (2-3):123-58.
Christopher Gauker (1993). Holism Without Meaning: A Critical Review of Fodor and Lepore's Holism: A Shopper's Guide. Philosophical Psychology 6 (4):441-49.
Johannes L. Brandl (1993). Semantic Holism is Here to Stay. In Holism: A Consumer Update. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Jane Heal (1994). Semantic Holism: Still a Good Buy. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 68:325-39.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #39,252 of 723,182 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,864 of 723,182 )
How can I increase my downloads?