Philosophia Mathematica 17 (3):363-368 (2009)
|Abstract||Easwaran has given a definition of transferability and argued that, under this definition, randomized arguments are not transferable. I show that certain aspects of his definition are not suitable for addressing the underlying question of whether or not there is an epistemic distinction between randomized and deductive arguments. Furthermore, I demonstrate that for any suitable definition, randomized arguments are in fact transferable|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James E. Sabin Kathleen Mazor Vanessa Meterko Sarah L. Goff Richard Platt (2008). Comparing Drug Effectiveness at Health Plans: The Ethics of Cluster Randomized Trials. Hastings Center Report 38 (5):pp. 39-48.
Eric Chwang (2012). Cluster Randomization and Political Philosophy. Bioethics 26 (9):476-484.
Peter B. M. Vranas (2012). New Foundations for Imperative Logic Iii: A General Definition of Argument Validity. Manuscript in Preparation.
John Worrall (2007). Why There's No Cause to Randomize. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):451 - 488.
A. la Caze (2009). Evidence-Based Medicine Must Be .. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (5):509-527.
Sherrilyn Roush (2009). Randomized Controlled Trials and the Flow of Information: Comment on Cartwright. Philosophical Studies 143 (1):137--145.
Fred Gifford (1986). The Conflict Between Randomized Clinical Trials and the Therapeutic Obligation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (4):347-366.
John T. Baldwin, Rami Grossberg & Saharon Shelah (1999). Transfering Saturation, the Finite Cover Property, and Stability. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):678-684.
D. Fallis (2000). The Reliability of Randomized Algorithms. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (2):255-271.
Added to index2009-10-05
Total downloads9 ( #115,463 of 556,774 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,774 )
How can I increase my downloads?