Reconciling Berkeley's Microscopes in God's Infinite Mind

Religious Studies 29 (4):453 - 463 (1993)
God knows or hath ideas; but His ideas are not convey'd to Him by sense, as ours are. Your not distinguishing where there is so manifest a difference, makes you fancy you see an absurdity where there is none
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412500022538
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,217
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Melissa Frankel (2016). Berkeley on the “Twofold State of Things”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 80 (1):43-60.
D. Jacquette (1995). Color and Armstrong's Color Realism Under the Microscope. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26 (3):389-406.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Robert W. Faaborg (1999). Berkeley and the Argument From Microscopes. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (4):301–323.
Walter Ott (2006). Descartes and Berkeley on Mind: The Fourth Distinction. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (3):437 – 450.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

14 ( #314,367 of 1,941,080 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #334,045 of 1,941,080 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.