David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind and Language 27 (2):200-227 (2012)
This paper assesses the scope and limits of a widely influential model of goal-ascription by human infants: the shared-intentionality model. It derives much of its appeal from its ability to integrate behavioral evidence from developmental psychology with cognitive neuroscientific evidence about the role of mirror neuron activity in non-human primates. The central question raised by this model is whether sharing a goal with an agent is necessary and sufficient for ascribing it to that agent. I argue that advocates of the shared-intentionality model underestimate both the distinction between the target and the goal of a goal-directed action and the gap between sharing and ascribing a goal
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
G. E. M. Anscombe (1957/2000). Intention. Harvard University Press.
Michael E. Bratman (1992). Shared Cooperative Activity. Philosophical Review 101 (2):327-341.
Gergely Csibra (2008). Goal Attribution to Inanimate Agents by 6.5-Month-Old Infants. Cognition 107 (2):705-717.
Gergely Csibra, György Gergely, Szilvia Bı́ró, Orsolya Koós & Margaret Brockbank (1999). Goal Attribution Without Agency Cues: The Perception of 'Pure Reason' in Infancy. Cognition 72 (3):237-267.
Jean Decety & Jessica A. Sommerville (2003). Shared Representations Between Self and Other: A Social Cognitive Neuroscience View. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (12):527-533.
Citations of this work BETA
Pierre Jacob (2013). How From Action-Mirroring to Intention-Ascription? Consciousness and Cognition 22 (3):1132-1141.
Similar books and articles
Pierre Jacob (2011). The Direct-Perception Model of Empathy: A Critique. [REVIEW] Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (3):519-540.
Pavel Prudkov (2010). A View on Human Goal-Directed Activity and the Construction of Artificial Intelligence. Minds and Machines 20 (3):363-383.
Michael Tomasello, Malinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Tanya Behne & Henrike Moll (2005). Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):675-691.
Alan Montefiore & Denis Noble (eds.) (1989). Goals, No-Goals, and Own Goals: A Debate on Goal-Directed and Intentional Behaviour. Unwin Hyman.
Charles S. Carver (1998). On the Self-Regulation of Behavior. Cambridge University Press.
Anita Konzelmann Ziv (2009). The Semantics of Shared Emotion. Universitas Philosophica 52:81-106.
Josef Perner & Martin Doherty (2005). Do Infants Understand That External Goals Are Internally Represented? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):710-711.
Alexa Bódog, Gábor P. Háden, Zoltán Jakab & Zsolt Palatinus (2005). Language, Ecological Structure, and Across-Population Sharing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):490-491.
I. Kiraly, B. Jovanovic, W. Prinz, G. Aschersleben & G. Gergely (2003). The Early Origins of Goal Attribution in Infancy. Consciousness and Cognition 12 (4):752-769.
Stephen Andrew Butterfill (2012). Joint Action and Development. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (246):23-47.
Mark A. Pitt & Yun Tang (2013). What Should Be the Data Sharing Policy of Cognitive Science? Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):214-221.
Barry Smith, Lowell Vizenor & James Schoening (2009). Universal Core Semantic Layer. In Ontology for the Intelligence Community, Proceedings of the Third OIC Conference. CEUR, vol. 555. 1-5.
Adam Barsky (2008). Understanding the Ethical Cost of Organizational Goal-Setting: A Review and Theory Development. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 81 (1):63 - 81.
Robert W. Lurz & Carla Krachun (2011). How Could We Know Whether Nonhuman Primates Understand Others' Internal Goals and Intentions? Solving Povinelli's Problem. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (3):449-481.
Marek McGann (2007). Enactive Theorists Do It on Purpose: Toward an Enactive Account of Goals and Goal-Directedness. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (4):463-483.
Added to index2012-03-27
Total downloads20 ( #88,982 of 1,100,097 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #304,144 of 1,100,097 )
How can I increase my downloads?