Stich againstde dicto‐de reambiguity

Philosophical Psychology 2 (2):223-230 (1989)
Abstract Stephen P. Stich rejects the de dicto?de re belief state and ascription distinction. He proposes an analysis by which belief sentences imply univocal doxastic predicates expressing functionally similar states of belief subjects and counterfactual third person belief ascribers, concluding that the apparent opacity of de dicto belief sentences is better explained by the unsystematic contextually?sensitive similarity vaguenesses of belief ascriptions. But Stick's reduction appeals to contexts of background beliefs which themselves unavoidably exhibit ramified de dicto?de re ambiguity. The distinction is presupposed rather than eliminated by Stick's method, which effectively blocks the extensional reduction of belief state opacity
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 14,255
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Justin Broackes (1986). Belief de Re and de Dicto. Philosophical Quarterly 36 (144):374-383.
John McDowell (1984). De Re Senses. Philosophical Quarterly 34 (136):283-294.
Mark J. Pastin (1974). About de Re Belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34 (4):569-575.

View all 8 references

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Ari Maunu (2000). A Simple Solution to the Problem of De Se Belief Ascriptions. Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 33 (3-4):199-226.
Srećko Kovač (2007). Contradictions, Objects, and Belief. In Jean-Yves Béziau & Alexandre Costa-Leite (eds.), Perspectives on Universal Logic. 417.
Andrew Ward (1989). The Relational Character of Belief. Grazer Philosophische Studien 35:73-82.
Don Ross (1986). Stich, Fodor and the Status of Belief. Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 5 (December):119-141.
Stephen P. Stich (1978). Beliefs and Subdoxastic States. Philosophy of Science 45 (December):499-518.
Justin Broackes (1986). Belief de Re and de Dicto. Philosophical Quarterly 36 (144):374-383.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

5 ( #338,493 of 1,700,244 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #269,935 of 1,700,244 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.