David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 40 (02):378- (1990)
The Euthydemus presents a brilliantly comic contrast between Socratic and sophistic argument. Socrates' encounter with the sophistic brothers Euthydemus and Dionysodorus exposes the hollowness of their claim to teach virtue, unmasking it as a predilection for verbal pugilism and the peddling of paradox. The dialogue's humour is pointed, for the brothers' fallacies are often reminiscent of substantial dilemmas explored seriously elsewhere in Plato, and the farce of their manipulation is in sharp contrast to the sobriety with which Socrates pursues his own protreptic questioning. But the strategies of this text are complex: the Euthydemus may be a playful satire of the desire to confound, yet beneath its knockabout humour a serious purpose is also visible
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sandra Peterson (2011). Socrates and Philosophy in the Dialogues of Plato. Cambridge University Press.
R. D. (2003). The Craft of Ruling in Plato's Euthydemus and Republic. Phronesis 48 (1):1-28.
Richard Parry (2003). The Craft of Ruling in Plato's "Euthydemus" and "Republic". Phronesis 48 (1):1 - 28.
Plato (2011). Socrates and the Sophists: Plato's Protagoras, Euthydemus, Hippias Major and Cratylus. Focus Publishing/ R. Pullins Co..
Anne-Marie Bowery (2008). Examining the Role and Function of Socrates' Narrative Audience in Plato's Euthydemus. Southwest Philosophy Review 24 (1):163-172.
Randall E. Auxier (2008). Anne Marie Bowery's “Examining the Role and Function of Socrates' Narrative Audience in Plato's Euthydemus”. Southwest Philosophy Review 24 (2):25-28.
Louis-André Dorion (2012). The Delphic Oracle on Socrates' Wisdom: A Myth? In Catherine Collobert, Pierre Destrée & Francisco J. Gonzalez (eds.), Plato and Myth: Studies on the Use and Status of Platonic Myths. Brill
Catherine Osborne (2006). Socrates in the Platonic Dialogues. Philosophical Investigations 29 (1):1–21.
Eric Brown, Socrates the Stoic? Rethinking Protreptic, Eudaimonism, and the Role of Plato's Socratic Dialogues.
Thomas C. Brickhouse (2004). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Plato and the Trial of Socrates. Routledge.
Jakub Jirsa (2012). Sophists, Names and Democracy. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):125-138.
Jan van Laar (2010). Argumentative Bluff in Eristic Discussion: An Analysis and Evaluation. Argumentation 24 (3):383-398.
Catherine H. Zuckert (2009). Plato's Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues. The University of Chicago Press.
Daniel Werner (2012). Myth and the Structure of Plato's Euthyphro. International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (1):41-62.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads6 ( #438,226 of 1,789,820 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #420,681 of 1,789,820 )
How can I increase my downloads?