David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):579-580 (2006)
This commentary discusses several problems with the target article by Ceci et al. First, the results admit of an alternative interpretation that undercuts the conclusion drawn. In addition, at a number of points, the research should be supplemented by examining situations in which there is no tenure-granting policy. Finally, 60% of the questions are concerned with whistle-blowing, but the issues involved in such cases make them much less relevant to the assessment of tenure than the authors suppose. (Published Online February 8 2007).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Rupert Read (2011). A Strengthened Ethical Version of Moore's Paradox? Lived Paradoxes of Self-Loathing in Psychosis and Neurosis. Philosophical Psychology 25 (1):133 - 141.
Similar books and articles
Douglas Peters (2006). Tenure is Fine, but Rank is Sublime. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):583-583.
Stephen J. Ceci, Wendy M. Williams & Katrin Mueller-Johnson (2006). Is Tenure Justified? An Experimental Study of Faculty Beliefs About Tenure, Promotion, and Academic Freedom. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):553-569.
Frank Farley (2006). The Untouchables: Benefits, Costs, and Risks of Tenure in Real Cases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):574-575.
James M. Clark (2006). Scientific Psychology and Tenure. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):571-572.
Kevin MacDonald (2006). Tenure is a Necessary – Not a Sufficient – Condition for Controversial Research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):581-581.
Gary Greenberg & Dorothy K. Billings (2006). In Defense of the Tenure System. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):578-579.
Jane L. Buck (2006). Why Ask If Tenure is Necessary? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):570-570.
Michael Shermer (2006). Testing Tenure: Let the Market Decide. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):584-585.
John Wettersten (2006). Put Tenure in Today's Social Context. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):585-586.
W. Bentley MacLeod (2006). Tenure is Justifiable. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):581-583.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #170,196 of 1,101,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #177,551 of 1,101,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?