The Catechol-O-Methyl Transferase Val158Met Polymorphism and Experience of Reward in the Flow of Daily Life
|Abstract||Genetic moderation of experience of reward in response to environmental stimuli is relevant for the study of many psychiatric disorders. Experience of reward, however, is difficult to capture, as it involves small fluctuations in affect in response to small events in the flow of daily life. This study examined a momentary assessment reward phenotype in relation to the catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) Val158Met polymorphism. A total of 351 participants from a twin study participated in an Experience Sampling Method procedure to collect daily life experiences concerning events, event appraisals, and affect. Reward experience was operationalized, as the effect of event appraisal on positive affect (PA). Associations between COMT Val 158Met genotype and event appraisal on the one hand and PA on the other were examined using multilevel random regression analysis. Ability to experience reward increased with the number of ‘Met’ alleles of the subject, and this differential effect of genotype was greater for events that were experienced as more pleasant. The effect size of genotypic moderation was quite large: subjects with the Val/Val genotype generated almost similar amounts of PA from a ‘very pleasant event’ as Met/Met subjects did from a ‘bit pleasant event’. Genetic variation with functional impact on cortical dopamine tone has a strong influence on reward experience in the flow of daily life. Genetic moderation of ecological measures of reward experience is hypothesized to be of major relevance to the development of various behavioral disorders, including depression and addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology (2008) 33, 3030–3036; doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301520; published online 8 August 2007..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Carolyn R. Morillo (1992). Reward Event Systems: Reconceptualizing the Explanatory Roles of Motivation, Desire and Pleasure. Philosophical Psychology 5 (1):7-32.
Carolyn R. Morillo (1995). Contingent Creatures: Reward Event Theory of Motivation. Rowman & Littlefield.
Michael Jacovides (2010). Experiences as Complex Events. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (2):141-159.
Amanda Parker (2000). The Amygdala – Responsible for Memories of Reward as Well as Punishment? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):213-214.
Charlotte Bloch (2000). Flow: Beyond Fluidity and Rigidity. A Phenomenological Investigation. Human Studies 23 (1):43 - 61.
Charlotte Bloch (2000). Flow: Beyond Fluidity and Rigidity. Human Studies 23 (1):43-61.
Jeffery R. Wickens & E. Gail Tripp (2005). Altered Sensitivity to Reward in Children with ADHD: Dopamine Timing is Off. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):445-446.
Varsha Singh & Azizuddin Khan (2008). Heterogeneity in Choices on Iowa Gambling Task: Preference for Infrequent–High Magnitude Punishment. Mind and Society 8 (1):43-57.
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi & Isabella Selega Csikszentmihalyi (eds.) (1988). Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Eve A. Isham & Joy J. Geng (forthcoming). Rewarding Performance Feedback Alters Reported Time of Action. Consciousness and Cognition.
Patricio O'Donnell (2005). Mesolimbic-Mesocortical Loops May Encode Saliency, Not Just Reward. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):360-361.
Marian Rabinowitz (1980). Medicine as a Trade. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 1 (3):255-261.
Nathaniel F. Barrett (2011). Wuwei and Flow: Comparative Reflections on Spirituality, Transcendence, and Skill in the Zhuangzi. Philosophy East and West 61 (4):679-706.
Elwin Myers (2010). Influence of Economic Reward and Punishment on Unethical Behavior. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 29 (1/4):155-174.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-12-22
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?