Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):365-380 (2005)
|Abstract||Temporal externalists argue that ascriptions of thought and utterance content can legitimately re?ect contingent conceptual developments that are only settled after the time of utterance. While the view has been criticized for failing to accord with our|
|Keywords||Deference Externalism Language Thought Utterance|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christopher Gauker (2003). Social Externalism and Linguistic Communication. In Maria J. Frapolli & E. Romero (eds.), Meaning, Basic Self-Knowledge, and Mind: Essays on Tyler Burge. CSLI.
Sarah Sawyer (2003). Conceptual Errors and Social Externalism. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):265-273.
Henry Jackman (2006). Temporal Externalism, Constitutive Norms, and Theories of Vagueness. In Tomas Marvan (ed.), What Determines Content? The Internalism/Externalism Dispute. Cambridge Scholars Press.
John M. Collins (2006). Temporal Externalism, Natural Kind Terms, and Scientifically Ignorant Communities. Philosophical Papers 35 (1):55-68.
Jessica Brown (2000). Against Temporal Externalism. Analysis 60 (2):178-188.
Henry Jackman (2004). Temporal Externalism and Epistemic Theories of Vagueness. Philosophical Studies 117 (1-2):79-94.
Tom Stoneham (2003). Temporal Externalism. Philosophical Papers 32 (1):97-107.
John Collins (2011). Why the Debate Between Originalists and Evolutionists Rests on a Semantic Mistake. Law and Philosophy 30 (6):645-684.
Henry Jackman (2005). Temporal Externalism, Deference, and Our Ordinary Linguistic Practice. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):365-380.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #74,462 of 722,764 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,438 of 722,764 )
How can I increase my downloads?