David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (03):304- (1995)
We know today that classical eugenics, of an essentially negative nature, was not only an aggressive and brutal practice but, like its positive counterpart, inefficient as well. In fact, numerous biological, sociological, and psychological events beyond our control arise to prevent the realisation of any eugenic plan. Thus, like all human beings, individuals whose procreation is encouraged by positive eugenics suffer unexpected mutations that are transmitted to their offspring by their gametes. Gene distribution among the gametes at meiosis is the result of an uncontrollable, natural lottery. As an effect of this lottery, positive eugenics could allow the birth of defective babies whereas negative eugenics precludes the birth of normal babies
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Gregory Todd Jones & Reidar Hagtvedt (2008). Marketing in Heterozygous Advantage. Journal of Business Ethics 77 (1):85 - 97.
Similar books and articles
Geoffrey Sher & Michael A. Feinman (1995). The Day-to-Day Realities: Commentary on The New Eugenics and Medicalized Reproduction. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (03):313-.
John C. Waller (2001). Ideas of Heredity, Reproduction and Eugenics in Britain, 1800–1875. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (3):457-489.
Robert Sparrow (2011). Liberalism and Eugenics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):499 - 517.
Kevin Aho & Charles Guignon (2011). Medicalized Psychiatry and the Talking Cure: A Hermeneutic Intervention. [REVIEW] Human Studies 34 (3):293-308.
Güvercin Ch & Arda B. (2013). Eugenics Concept: From Plato to Present. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 14 (2):20 - 26.
Gregory K. Pike (2010). What 'Really' Is Eugenics? Bioethics Research Notes 22 (4):47.
Tomasz Sahaj (2006). XIX- i XX-wieczna eugenika społeczna w ujęciu historyczno-filozoficznym. Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej 50.
Wade Roberts (2007). Autonomy, Pluralism, and the Future of the Species: Agar and Habermas on Liberal Eugenics. Philosophical Explorations 22:153-167.
Jyotsna Agnihotri Gupta (2007). Private and Public Eugenics: Genetic Testing and Screening in India. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):217-228.
Stephen Wilkinson (2010). Choosing Tomorrow's Children: The Ethics of Selective Reproduction. Oup Oxford.
Jacqueline A. Laing (2006). The Prohibition on Eugenics and Reproductive Liberty. University of New South Wales Law Journal 29:261-266.
Gavril Acălugăriţei (1986). Classification of Types of Ontogenetic Reproduction. Acta Biotheoretica 35 (1-2):107-121.
Maxine Sheets-Johnstone (2002). Review: Medicalized Bodies. [REVIEW] Human Studies 25 (2):233 - 239.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads14 ( #126,305 of 1,413,411 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,345 of 1,413,411 )
How can I increase my downloads?