David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (s2):86-100 (2009)
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act is a federal law regulating the administration of private employer-sponsored benefits including health benefits . In general, since the federal government has exercised its authority to preempt state regulation of the administration of private employer-sponsored health plans, states are blocked from enforcing laws interfering with ERISA. As many states pursue health care reform experiments, ERISA preemption becomes relevant as a potential limit on the scope and type of reforms states are able to enact. The dominant trend in ERISA litigation has been to preempt state legislation and litigation interfering with the administration of private employer-sponsored health plans, making large-scale state health care reform initiatives difficult. The purpose of this paper is to examine the trajectory of judicial interpretation of ERISA and to discuss what opportunities exist to facilitate health care initiatives given the constraints of ERISA preemption
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter J. van Hemel (2000). ERISA: State Tort Claim for Fraud and Negligent Misrepresentation Survives ERISA Preemption?Shea V. Esensten. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (2):190-191.
Kristin Lefebvre (2007). An Ethical Evaluation of the Supreme Court Decision Regarding ERISA Interpretation. Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):327-334.
Tal Sapeika (2000). ERISA: No Preemption of State's HMO Law Requiring Independent Physician Review. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4):407-408.
Lorian E. Hardcastle, Katherine L. Record, Peter D. Jacobson & Lawrence O. Gostin (2011). Improving the Population's Health: The Affordable Care Act and the Importance of Integration. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):317-327.
Marsha Lillie-Blanton, Saqi Maleque & Wilhelmine Miller (2008). Reducing Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Health Care: Opportunities in National Health Reform. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):693-702.
John Aloysius Cogan (2011). The Affordable Care Act's Preventive Services Mandate: Breaking Down the Barriers to Nationwide Access to Preventive Services. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):355-365.
Bruce Siegel, Marsha Regenstein & Peter Shin (2004). Health Reform and the Safety Net: Big Opportunities: Major Risks. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (3):426-432.
Lawrence O. Gostin (2011). The FDA, Preemption, and Public Safety. Hastings Center Report 41 (5):11-12.
Phyllis C. Borzi (2008). There's “Private” and Then There's “Private”: ERISA, Its Impact, and Options for Reform. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):660-669.
Laurence J. O'Connell (1994). Ethicists and Health Care Reform: An Indecent Proposal? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (5):419-424.
Pedro Gallo (2004). Integrating Ethical Enquiry and Health Technology Assessment: Limits and Opportunities for Efficiency and Equity. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):103-117.
Mary Zendran (2000). ERISA: Health Benefit Plans Discriminating Against Providers. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):311-312.
Norman Daniels (1994). The Articulation of Values and Principles Involved in Health Care Reform. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (5):425-433.
Norman Daniels (2001). Justice, Health, and Healthcare. American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):2 – 16.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads5 ( #248,936 of 1,413,334 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,079 of 1,413,334 )
How can I increase my downloads?