The Relevance of Aristotle's Notion of Equity for the Contemporary Abortion Debate
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:119-132 (2004)
| Abstract | In this paper I explore Aristotle’s idea of epikeia, or equity, in relation to the contemporary abortion debate. Equity is the rule of justice that insists we gobeyond the letter of the law in those cases in which following it would be harmful. One consequence of this is that we do not need to create exceptionless laws,since laws can admit exceptions for the sake of a higher good. I argue that this arrangement appears to be a reasonable way to move the abortion debate forward, since the common good would mandate the prohibition of most abortions, but applications of equity would protect access to abortion for those considered most in need. In the end, though, despite this reasonableness, its usefulness for reforming abortion law is limited due to the current hostility of the American legislature to natural law as a higher form of justice | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDavid F. Walbert (1973). Abortion, Society, and the Law. Cleveland [Ohio]Press of Case Western Reserve University.
Mathew Lu (2013). Aristotle on Abortion and Infanticide. International Philosophical Quarterly 53 (1):47-62.
Mary B. Mahowald (1982). Concepts of Abortion and Their Relevance to the Abortion Debate. Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):195-207.
Richard Schoenig (1998). Abortion, Christianity, and Consistency. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 5 (1):32-37.
Kate Gleeson (2009). The Other Abortion Myth—the Failure of the Common Law. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1).
Stephen R. Goldstein (ed.) (1992). Equity and Contemporary Legal Developments: Papers Presented at the First International Conference on Equity, the Faculty of Law, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, June 1990. Harry and Michael Sacher Institute for Legislative Research and Comparative Law, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Stephen Griffith (1985). How Not to Argue About Abortion. Philosophy Research Archives 11:347-354.
Alfred Simon (2000). A Right to Life for the Unborn? The Current Debate on Abortion in Germany and Norbert Hoerster's Legal-Philosophical Justification for the Right to Life. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (2):220 – 239.
Zac Alstin (2012). Abortion Rates: Is a Rough Estimate Better Than No Estimate at All? Bioethics Research Notes 24 (2):32.
Chris Kaposy (2012). Two Stalemates in the Philosophical Debate About Abortion and Why They Cannot Be Resolved Using Analogical Arguments. Bioethics 26 (2):84-92.
Chris Heathwood (2011). The Significance of Personal Identity to Abortion. Bioethics 25 (4):230-232.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-12-01Total downloads1 ( #277,212 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
