David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Noûs 41 (2):298–317 (2007)
These days it is widely agreed that there is no such thing as absolute motion and rest; the motion of an object can only be characterized with respect to some chosen frame of reference.1 This is a fact of which many of us are well-aware, and yet a cursory consideration of the ways we ascribe motion to objects gives the impression that it is a fact we persistently ignore. We insist to the police officer that we came to a full and complete stop at the stop sign, we fret that traffic is moving too slowly, we observe that the sun has dropped below the hills on the horizon, all without ever saying which frames of reference we have in mind.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David K. Lewis (1983). Philosophical Papers. Oxford University Press.
Peter van Inwagen (1990). Material Beings. Cornell University Press.
Peter K. Unger (1975). Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism. Oxford University Press.
Jason Stanley (2000). Context and Logical Form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23 (4):391--434.
Noam Chomsky (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Adam Sennet (2008). The Binding Argument and Pragmatic Enrichment, or, Why Philosophers Care Even More Than Weathermen About 'Raining'. Philosophy Compass 3 (1):135-157.
Andrew Kenneth Jorgensen (2010). The Sky Over Canberra: Folk Discourse and Serious Metaphysics. Philosophia 38 (2):365-383.
Similar books and articles
Jason Stanley (2001). Hermeneutic Fictionalism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25 (1):36–71.
Albert Einstein (1923). On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies. In The Principle of Relativity. Dover 35-65.
A. H. Wertheim (1999). Motion Percepts: “Sense Specific,” “Kinematic,” or . . . ? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):338-340.
Robert Rynasiewicz (2000). On the Distinction Between Absolute and Relative Motion. Philosophy of Science 67 (1):70-93.
John David Rhodes & Elena Gorfinkel (eds.) (2011). Taking Place: Location and the Moving Image. University of Minnesota Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #104,061 of 1,934,424 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #52,871 of 1,934,424 )
How can I increase my downloads?