David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Review 117 (2):159-191 (2008)
This essay argues, flouting paradox, that Mill was a utilitarian but not a consequentialist. First, it contends that there is logical space for a view that deserves to be called utilitarian despite its rejection of consequentialism; second, that this logical space is, in fact, occupied by John Stuart Mill. The key to understanding Mill's unorthodox utilitarianism and the role it plays in his moral philosophy is to appreciate his sentimentalist metaethics—especially his account of wrongness in terms of fitting guilt and resentment. Mill recognizes a fundamental moral asymmetry between the agent and others, which conflicts intractably with a presupposition of consequentialism. This allows him to differentiate three potentially conflicting evaluative spheres: morality, prudence, and aesthetics. This essay's account of Mill's utilitarianism coheres with his defense of individual liberty and his embrace of supererogation, both of which elude traditional interpretations.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Tom Dougherty (2013). Agent-Neutral Deontology. Philosophical Studies 163 (2):527-537.
Paul C. Snelling (2014). What's Wrong with Tombstoning and What Does This Tell Us About Responsibility for Health? Public Health Ethics 7 (2):144-157.
Christopher Macleod (forthcoming). Mill's Antirealism. Philosophical Quarterly:pqv072.
Rafael Cejudo (2014). Decision Making in Compromise Situations: Guidelines Based on J. S. Mill's Doctrine of Political Half‐Measures. Business Ethics: A European Review 23 (4):364-374.
Similar books and articles
John Stuart Mill (1963). The Six Great Humanistic Essays of John Stuart Mill. New York, Washington Square Press.
John Stuart Mill (1961). The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill: Ethical, Political, and Religious. New York, Modern Library.
Daniel Jacobson (2003). J.S. Mill and the Diversity of Utilitarianism. Philosophers' Imprint 3 (2):1-18.
John Stuart Mill (1962). Utilitarianism. Cleveland, World Pub. Co..
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads212 ( #15,996 of 1,932,483 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #197,457 of 1,932,483 )
How can I increase my downloads?