Why a conceptualist view of reference? A reply to Abbott
Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (2):211-219 (1998)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDenis Noble (1967). The Conceptualist View of Teleology. Analysis 28 (2):62 - 63.
James Russell & Robert Hanna (2012). A Minimalist Approach to the Development of Episodic Memory. Mind and Language 27 (1):29-54.
Charlie Pelling (2007). Conceptualism and the Problem of Illusory Experience. Acta Analytica 22 (3):169-182.
Iris Einheuser (2011). Toward a Conceptualist Solution of the Grounding Problem. Noûs 45 (2):300-314.
Roger Wertheimer (1978). Errata: A Reply to Abbott. Political Theory 6 (3):337-344.
Barbara Abbott (2010). Reference. Oxford University Press.
Charlie Pelling (2007). Conceptualism and the (Supposed) Non-Transitivity of Colour Indiscriminability. Philosophical Studies 134 (2):211 - 234.
Charles Pelling (2008). Concepts, Attention, and Perception. Philosophical Papers 37 (2):213-242.
Philip Abbott (1979). On Wertheimer's "Errata: A Reply to Abbott". Political Theory 7 (1):139-141.
Michael K. Shim (2006). Leibniz on Concept and Substance. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (3):309-325.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads17 ( #70,994 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,320 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
