What Matters in Phenomenal Consciousness: A Conative-Evaluative Account

Dissertation, Harvard University (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Current theories of phenomenal consciousness---theories, that is, of the felt or qualitative aspect of mental states---are often accused of leaving out the essential features of this phenomenon. Moreover, the opponents of these theories typically hold that their failure is not accidental. They argue either that the problem of phenomenal consciousness is unsolvable, or that we still lack even the conceptual resources needed for its solution. My dissertation challenges both the adequacy of current theories and the skeptical stance of their rivals. I think that current approaches are indeed in principle incapable of capturing phenomenal consciousness, but that an account that does capture this phenomenon is within our reach. The reason for the failure of these theories, I argue, is the underlying assumption that phenomenality consists in various strictly cognitive and representational features of mental systems. ;The main purpose of my dissertation is to lay the foundations for an alternative account of phenomenal consciousness, according to which "the missing element of consciousness"---the one needed for capturing the allegedly intractable features of this phenomenon---is the conative-evaluative aspect of our minds. Conative-evaluative attitudes like desires, interests and preferences play an essential role in constituting phenomenality. I argue that phenomenality arises from an interplay between our cognitive nature, and, in particular, the representational aspect of our minds, and our conative-evaluative nature. There can be no phenomenality---nothing "it is like" to be sensitive to various conditions---if all there is is neutral-unevaluated information. Rather, what gives rise to phenomenality is the subject's being non-indifferent towards information---her adopting conative-evaluative attitudes towards, and thereby conferring significance upon, items represented by her states. In the phenomenal mode information is "evaluatively loaded"---it is "colored" by the subject's evaluative outlook; and what creates the evaluative outlook is conative attitudes of various sorts. The "subjective point of view", which is widely taken to be the mark of the phenomenal, is actually an evaluative point of view

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How many kinds of consciousness?David M. Rosenthal - 2002 - Consciousness and Cognition 11 (4):653-665.
Theories of consciousness.Uriah Kriegel - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (1):58-64.
Phenomenal consciousness and intentionality.Dana K. Nelkin - 2001 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 7.
Phenomenal consciousness lite: No thanks!J. Kevin O'Regan & Erik Myin - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (5-6):520-521.
Understanding Consciousness.Charles Peter Siewert - 1994 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Addressing Higher-Order Misrepresentation with Quotational Thought.Vincent Picciuto - 2011 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (3-4):109-136.
Phenomenal consciousness and the first-person.Joseph Levine - 2001 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 7.
Two conceptions of machine phenomenality.Steve Torrance - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (7):154-166.
Conceptualizing physical consciousness.James Tartaglia - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (6):817-838.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
1 (#1,886,728)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hilla Jacobson
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references