Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):117-138 (2012)
|Abstract||Negative facts get a bad press. One reason for this is that it is not clear what negative facts are. We provide a theory of negative facts on which they are no stranger than positive atomic facts. We show that none of the usual arguments hold water against this account. Negative facts exist in the usual sense of existence and conform to an acceptable Eleatic principle. Furthermore, there are good reasons to want them around, including their roles in causation, chance-making and truth-making, and in constituting holes and edges.|
|Keywords||Facts Negative facts Ontology Truthmaking|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Veber (2008). How to Derive a 'Not' From an 'Is': A Defense of the Incompatibility View of Negative Truths. [REVIEW] Metaphysica 9 (1):79-91.
Colin Cheyne & Charles Pigden (2006). Negative Truths From Positive Facts. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):249 – 265.
Mark Jago (2011). Setting the Facts Straight. Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (1):33-54.
Robin Stenwall (2010). Causal Truthmaking. Metaphysica 11 (2):211-222.
Tobies Grimaltos (1992). EIs fets negatius en el «Tractatus Logico-Philosphicus». Theoria 7 (1/2/3):847-858.
L. Nathan Oaklander & Silvano Miracchi (1980). Russell, Negative Facts, and Ontology. Philosophy of Science 47 (3):434-455.
Frank Hofmann (2006). Truthmaking, Recombination, and Facts Ontology. Philosophical Studies 128 (2):409-440.
George Englebretsen (2010). Making Sense of Truth-Makers. Topoi 29 (2):147-151.
Benjamin Mossel (2009). Negative Actions. Philosophia 37 (2):307-333.
Gunnar Björnsson, If You Believe in Positive Facts, You Should Believe in Negative Facts. Hommage à Wlodek. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz.
Added to index2010-03-12
Total downloads335 ( #442 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)75 ( #470 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?