Synthese 167 (2):327 - 341 (2009)
|Abstract||Gaining information can be modelled as a narrowing of epistemic space . Intuitively, becoming informed that such-and-such is the case rules out certain scenarios or would-be possibilities. Chalmers’s account of epistemic space treats it as a space of a priori possibility and so has trouble in dealing with the information which we intuitively feel can be gained from logical inference. I propose a more inclusive notion of epistemic space, based on Priest’s notion of open worlds yet which contains only those epistemic scenarios which are not obviously impossible. Whether something is obvious is not always a determinate matter and so the resulting picture is of an epistemic space with fuzzy boundaries.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Frank Jackson (2009). Possibilities for Representation and Credence: Two Space-Ism Versus One Space-Ism. In Andy Egan & B. Weatherson (eds.), Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press.
Don Fallis (2004). Epistemic Value Theory and Information Ethics. Minds and Machines 14 (1):101-117.
Mark Jago (2009). Epistemic Logic for Rule-Based Agents. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 18 (1).
Luciano Floridi (2008). Understanding Epistemic Relevance. Erkenntnis 69 (1):69 - 92.
J. F. A. K. van Benthem (2011). Logical Dynamics of Information and Interaction. Cambridge University Press.
Jens Christian Bjerring (forthcoming). Impossible Worlds and Logical Omniscience: An Impossibility Result. Synthese.
Mark Jago (2006). Imagine the Possibilities: Information Without Overload. Logique Et Analyse 49 (196):345–371.
Jens Christian Bjerring (2010). Non-Ideal Epistemic Spaces. Dissertation, Australian National University
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads86 ( #8,707 of 556,772 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,754 of 556,772 )
How can I increase my downloads?