Christian Mysteries and Berkeley's Alleged Non-Cognitivism

In Stephen H. Daniel (ed.), Reexamining Berkeley's Philosophy (2007)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Roomet Jakapi (2002). Emotive Meaning and Christian Mysteries in Berkeley's Alciphron. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (3):401 – 411.
Thomas Poynor (2008). “How Can These Things Be?”. Newman Studies Journal 5 (1):51-62.
Richard J. Van Iten (1962). Berkeley's Alleged Solipsism. Revue International de Philosophie 16 (61-62):447-452.
Jaimir Conte (2008). A Oposição de Berkeley Ao Ceticismo. Cadernos de História de Filosofia da Ciência 18 (2):3225-355.

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index


Total downloads


Recent downloads (6 months)


How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.