Assisting Research Ethics Boards in Substantive Ethical Deliberation

The Lonergan Review 7 (1):183-213 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.5840/lonerganreview2016719

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reflections on My Experience in Human Research Ethics.K. G. Davey - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):27-31.
Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical?Murray Dyck & Gary Allen - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):517-520.
Juggling through hoops: Implementing ethics policies in applied language studies. [REVIEW]Janna Fox, Natasha Artemeva, Richard Darville & Devon Woods - 2006 - Journal of Academic Ethics 4 (1-4):77-99.
Using electronic discussion boards to teach responsible conduct of research.David B. Resnik - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):617-630.
Ethical considerations in geographic research: What especially graduate students need to know.Daniel A. Griffith - 2008 - Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (3):237 – 252.
Ethical dilemmas in research in relation to ethical review: An empirical study.Gunnel Colnerud - 2014 - Research Ethics 10 (4):238-253.
Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues.Elizabeth A. Buchanan & Charles M. Ess - 2009 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 39 (3):43-49.
Ethical international research on human subjects research in the absence of local institutional review boards.S. B. Bhat - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):535-536.
“Just one animal among many?” Existential phenomenology, ethics, and stem cell research.Norman K. Swazo - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (3):197-224.
The Importance of Ethical Appraisal in Social Science Research: Reviewing a Faculty of Humanities' Research Ethics Committee. [REVIEW]Katinka De Wet - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (4):301-314.
Behind Closed Doors: Irbs and the Making of Ethical Research.Laura Stark - 2011 - University of Chicago Press.
Public deliberation to develop ethical norms and inform policy for biobanks: Lessons learnt and challenges remaining.Kieran C. O’Doherty & Michael M. Burgess - 2013 - Research Ethics 9 (2):55-77.
Empirical research on research ethics.Joan E. Sieber - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):397 – 412.
The importance of virtue ethics in the IRB.Marilyn C. Morris & Jason Z. Morris - 2016 - Research Ethics 12 (4):201-216.
Ethics issues with private research ethics boards: A breakout session at the 2009 ncehr national conference.Jack Corman Francis Rolleston, Paddi O'Hara Serge Gauthier & Rod Schmaltz - forthcoming - Journal of Academic Ethics.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-10

Downloads
18 (#762,892)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christine Jamieson
University of Toronto

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references