Conceptual Innovation in Fichte's Theory of Property: The Genesis of Leisure as an Object of Distributive Justice
Graduate studies at Western
European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2) (2012)
|Abstract||Fichte's definitions of property appear to diverge from modern common linguistic usage, especially his identification of leisure as the object of an absolute right of property, and they may even appear arbitrary. I argue that these definitions are not in fact arbitrary. Rather, any divergence from common linguistic usage can be explained in terms of a conceptual innovation which consists in expanding or modifying a concept by thinking it through, thereby generating new content. In the case of Fichte's theory of property, this content turns out to be leisure as the primary object of a theory of distributive justice. The conceptual innovation found in Fichte's theory of property invites a reconceptualization of the relation between work and freedom|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David James (2011). Fichte's Social and Political Philosophy: Property and Virtue. Cambridge University Press.
Eric Rakowski (1991). Equal Justice. Oxford University Press.
John T. Sanders (1987). Justice and the Initial Acquisition of Property. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 10 (2):367-99.
Sean D. Kelly (2001). The Non-Conceptual Content of Perceptual Experience: Situation Dependence and Fineness of Grain. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):601-608.
B. Andrew Lustig (1991). Natural Law, Property, and Justice: The General Justification of Property in John Locke. Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (1):119 - 149.
J. W. Harris (2002). Property and Justice. OUP Oxford.
Philippe Chuard (2006). Demonstrative Concepts Without Reidentification. Philosophical Studies 130 (2):153-201.
Hayden Ramsay (2005). Reclaiming Leisure: Art, Sport, and Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Alan Weir (2004). An Ultra-Realist Theory of Perception. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (2):105-128.
Sylvie Loriaux (2007). Kant on International Distributive Justice. Journal of Global Ethics 3 (3):281 – 301.
Gopal Sreenivasan (1995). The Limits of Lockean Rights in Property. Oxford University Press.
Teresa Robertson, Essential Vs. Accidental Properties. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2012-06-06
Total downloads8 ( #131,938 of 740,944 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,957 of 740,944 )
How can I increase my downloads?