Evolution and Conservative Christianity: How Philosophy of Science Pedagogy Can Begin the Conversation

Spontaneous Generations 2 (1):185-212 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I teach Philosophy of Science at a four-year state university located in the southeastern United States with a strong college of education. This means that the Philosophy of Science class I teach attracts large numbers of students who will later become science teachers in Georgia junior high and high schools—the same schools that recently began including evolution "warning" stickers in science textbooks. I am also a faculty member in a department combining Religious Studies and Philosophy. This means Philosophy of Science is often expected to provide dialogue, debate, and bridge-building on the issues of creationism and evolution. I am expected to provide a welcoming atmosphere to all the religious perspectives that the students bring to class, but at the same time I feel responsible for giving them a serious respect for evolution. This tension between religious tolerance and secular science education has had important consequences in American schools, most notably with the issue of Intelligent Design Theory (ID) in the classroom.

Similar books and articles

What Science Can and Cannot Say: The Problems with Methodological Naturalism.Reed Richter - 2002 - Reports of the National Center for Science Education 22 (Jan-Apr 2002):18-22.
Creationism and Intelligent Design.Robert T. Pennock - 2003 - Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 4:143-163.
In Defence of Intelligent Design.William Dembski - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 715-731.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-29

Downloads
674 (#22,346)

6 months
92 (#39,503)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christine James
Valdosta State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

From Ruse to Farce.Michael Lynch - 2006 - Social Studies of Science 36 (6):819-826.

Add more references