Graduate studies at Western
Inquiry 54 (4):384-397 (2011)
|Abstract||Abstract Everyday inanimate things such as stones, teapots and bicycles are not objects to which moral agents could have direct duties; they do not have moral status. It is usually assumed that there is therefore no reason to think that a morally good person would, on account of her goodness, be disposed to treat them well for their own sakes. I challenge this assumption. I begin by showing that to act for the sake of an entity need not be to suppose that it has moral status, but simply to regard it as an end in itself. Having done this, I argue that it is not, as is conventionally assumed, implausible to suppose that to be morally good is to be disposed to treat at least some inanimate things gently, and to do so, moreover, for the sake of those things, rather than for some other reason|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kenneth E. Goodpaster (1980). On Stopping at Everything. Environmental Ethics 2 (3):281-284.
Kenneth E. Goodpaster (1980). On Stopping at Everything: A Reply to W. M. Hunt. Environmental Ethics 2 (3):281-284.
Saul Smilansky (2005). On Not Being Sorry About The Morally Bad. Philosophy 80 (02):261 - 265.
Kym Maclaren (2008). Embodied Perceptions of Others as a Condition of Selfhood? Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (8):63-93.
Georgia Testa (2003). Gauthier and the Capacity for Morality. Res Publica 9 (3):223-242.
G. Abend (2013). What the Science of Morality Doesn't Say About Morality. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):157-200.
Richard Arneson (2009). Human Flourishing Versus Desire Satisfaction. Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (01):113-.
Edmund D. Pellegrino (2005). Some Things Ought Never Be Done: Moral Absolutes in Clinical Ethics. [REVIEW] Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (6):469-486.
Susan Mendus (2008). Life's Ethical Symphony. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (2):201-218.
Wlodek Rabinowicz & Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen (2000). A Distinction in Value: Intrinsic and for its Own Sake. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (1):33–51.
Douglas W. Portmore (2008). Are Moral Reasons Morally Overriding? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (4):369 - 388.
Elizabeth Harman (2007). Sacred Mountains and Beloved Fetuses: Can Loving or Worshipping Something Give It Moral Status? Philosophical Studies 133 (1):55 - 81.
Ruth Chang (2004). All Things Considered. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):1–22.
James C. Anderson (1991). Moral Planes and Intrinsic Values. Environmental Ethics 13 (1):49-58.
John C. Maraldo (2012). Four Things and Two Practices: Rethinking Heidegger Ex Oriente Lux. Comparative and Continental Philosophy 4 (1):53 - 74.
Added to index2011-07-15
Total downloads24 ( #57,851 of 722,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,098 of 722,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?